Engineer the structure. Let AI file the paperwork.
Method statements, inspection records and submission packages handled, so engineering judgement goes to engineering.
Where the hours actually go.
Method statements for every activity
Every work activity needs a documented method statement and risk assessment before it starts. Writing them is hours of structured prose per activity.
Authority submission packages
BCA, LTA and PUB submissions each have their own formats, forms and checklists. Package assembly is clerical work stacked on top of the engineering.
Site inspection records
Rebar inspections, pre-pour checks, load tests. Each needs documented sign-off with photos, and the record matters years later.
Design revision tracking
Drawings revise constantly through a project. Tracking what changed, who approved it and what is current is manual vigilance.
Your toolkit inside kiap.ai
Live today inside the super app, or being built on the same API. Everything AI drafts, you approve.
Method statement drafter
Drafts method statements and risk assessments from your activity description and past documents. You verify the engineering; it handles the prose.
Submission package checker
In the worksAssembles BCA, LTA or PUB submission documents against the authority checklist and flags gaps before the QP signs.
Inspection record capture
Digital inspection checklists with photo evidence and sign-off on site, filed per element and retrievable years later.
Technical report drafts
Drafts site reports, test summaries and design narratives from your data and notes, formatted to your firm's standard.
Drawing revision log
Every drawing issue and revision tracked with approval status, so "what is current" has a real answer.
Engineering fee invoicing
Stage or monthly invoices for consultancy work with progress billing, so finance runs alongside the project.
A day with AI doing the busywork.
Review the AI-drafted method statement for tomorrow's sheet piling. Verify the sequence and safety controls, issue.
Rebar inspection at grid C4. Checklist and photos filed on your phone, contractor countersigns digitally.
The LTA submission package is assembled against the checklist; two missing forms flagged before the QP sees it.
A draft report on the load test goes to the client, compiled from the test data and your notes.
Questions civil engineers actually ask.
Will AI replace civil engineers?
No. PE judgement, the QP signature and design responsibility are human and legal. AI removes the documentation grind: method statements, records, package assembly. You engineer; it files.
Does it help with BCA, LTA and PUB submissions?
The package checker assembles your documents against each authority's checklist and flags what is missing. The QP reviews and signs; the clerical hunt disappears.
Can site staff use the inspection tools?
Yes. Digital checklists with photo capture work on any phone, and records file automatically per element, pour or chainage.
How does drafting stay technically accurate?
AI drafts from your inputs and your past documents. You review and own the engineering content; it accelerates the writing, not the decisions.
What does it cost?
Standard plan pricing. For consultancies, one faster submission cycle usually covers the year.
Keep the craft. Drop the admin.
See your toolkit running inside kiap.ai. One call, a real walkthrough, no pressure.